Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 16, 2025; 13(23): 101742
Published online Aug 16, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i23.101742
Published online Aug 16, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i23.101742
Table 6 Comparison between the training and validation cohorts of the radiomics models
Model | Training cohort (n = 85) | Validation cohort (n = 37) | ||||||
AUC | 95%CI | Sensitivity% | Specificity% | AUC | 95%CI | Sensitivity% | Specificity% | |
Arterial phase | 0.885 | 0.814-0.955 | 0.829 | 0.613 | 0.592 | 0.400-0.783 | 0.476 | 0.428 |
Venous phase | 0.867 | 0.790-0.940 | 0.863 | 0.686 | 0.755 | 0.600-0.910 | 0.818 | 0.533 |
Arteria + venous phase | 0.84 | 0.758-0.923 | 0.823 | 0.657 | 0.645 | 0.461-0.829 | 0.590 | 0.467 |
Peritumor 5- mm (venous phase) | 0.866 | 0.791-0.941 | 0.863 | 0.656 | 0.594 | 0.402-0.786 | 0.591 | 0.667 |
Peritumor 10- mm (venous phase) | 0.922 | 0.866-0.977 | 0.921 | 0.686 | 0.603 | 0.408-0.799 | 0.682 | 0.467 |
- Citation: Zhao KF, Xie CB, Wu Y. Prediction of the efficacy of first transarterial chemoembolization for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma via a clinical-radiomics model. World J Clin Cases 2025; 13(23): 101742
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v13/i23/101742.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v13.i23.101742