Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 26, 2024; 12(9): 1560-1568
Published online Mar 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i9.1560
Table 1 Characteristics of the 13 included patients
Case
Sex
Age (yr)
Side of knee
Year of revision
Duration of prosthesis
Cause for UKA revision
Outcome of UKA revision
Patient 1Female61Right20171 monthImproper sutureCured
Patient 2Male69Right20184 monthsOsteophyteCured
Patient 3Male67Right20175 monthsOsteophyteCured
Patient 4Female59Left201820 monthsIntra-articular loose bodyCured
Patient 5Female70Left202036 monthsIntra-articular loose bodyCured
Patient 6Male75Right20188 monthsTibial prosthesis looseningCured
Patient 7Female70Left201823 monthsTibial prosthesis looseningCured
Patient 8Female76Right201772 monthsRheumatoid arthritisCured
Patient 9Female76Right201815 monthsACL injuryCured
Patient 10Female63Right20197 monthsGasket dislocationCured
Patient 11Female63Right201648 monthsGasket dislocationCured
Patient 12Female69Left201810 monthsGasket dislocationCured
Patient 13Female61Left20183 dMedial collateral ligament injury and bone cement residueCured