BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Home / Archive / Volume 11, Issue 27
  • This Article
Peer-Review Report of This Article
CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article
Academic Rules and Norms of This Article
Citation of this article
Corresponding Author of This Article
Research Domain of This Article
Article-Type of This Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Clinical Cases
ISSN
2307-8960
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2023; 11(27): 6415-6423
Published online Sep 26, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i27.6415
Table 3 Comparison of catheterization complications between indwelling pleural
Complication
IPC group (n = 42)
CVC group (n = 18)
χ2
P value
Use of analgesics6 (14.2)1 (5.5)0.2770.599b
Catheter occlusions2 (4.7)7 (38.8)8.9880.003a,b
Catheter prolapse6 (7.1)7 (36.3)4.4940.034a
Subcutaneous emphysema3 (7.1)6 (33.3)4.8800.027a,b
Pulmonary infection1 (2.3)1 (9.0)01b
Incision infection1 (2.3)1 (9.0)01b
aSignificant difference between groups.
bContinuous correction.
IPC: Indwelling pleural catheter; CVC: Central venous catheter.
Full Size Table
Write to the Help Desk
Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA. All rights reserved, including rights relating to text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For open-access content, the applicable copyright and licensing terms govern.