Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. May 26, 2023; 11(15): 3491-3501
Published online May 26, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i15.3491
Published online May 26, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i15.3491
Table 4 Comparison of efficacy between the two groups, n (%)
| Groups | Recovery | Good | Fair | Poor | Amputa-tion/death | Total effective rate |
| Control group (n = 34) | 18 (52.94) | 10 (29.41) | 5 (14.71) | 1 (2.94) | 0 (0) | 33 (97.06) |
| Observation group (n = 28) | 16 (57.14) | 8 (28.57) | 4 (14.29) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0) | 28 (100.00) |
| χ2 value | 0.837 | |||||
| P value | 0.360 |
- Citation: Meng XH, Xie XP, Liu YC, Huang CP, Wang LJ, Liu HY, Fang X, Zhang GH. Observation of the effect of angiojet to treat acute lower extremity arterial embolization. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(15): 3491-3501
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i15/3491.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i15.3491