Comparative study of the clinical efficacy of all-inside and traditional techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 11, Issue 14

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Clinical Cases

ISSN

2307-8960

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Observational Study

World J Clin Cases. May 16, 2023; 11(14): 3195-3203
Published online May 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3195

Table 1 Comparison of knee International Knee Documentation Committee scores between the two groups

AIST: All-inside quadrupled semitendinosus; IKDC: International Knee Documentation Committee; TBT: Traditional hamstring tendon.

Citation: An BJ, Wang YT, Zhao Z, Wang MX, Xing GY. Comparative study of the clinical efficacy of all-inside and traditional techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(14): 3195-3203
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i14/3195.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3195

An BJ, Wang YT, Zhao Z, Wang MX, Xing GY. Comparative study of the clinical efficacy of all-inside and traditional techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(14): 3195-3203 [PMID: 37274047 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3195]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.