Controversies in the management of acute pancreatitis: An update

Table 9 Timing of first catheter drainage and outcome in various studies of acute pancreatitis

Ref.	Number of days after the onset of the disease when PCD was performed, mean (range)	Patients, n	IPN, %	Mortality, %
Infected necrotic collection
Freeny et al[112], 1998	9 (1-48)	34	100	12
Navalho et al[110], 2006	18	30	100	17
Mortelé et al[113], 2009	12 (2-33)	13	100	17
Baril et al[114], 2000	24 (18-30)a	7	100	0
Bala et al[115], 2009	26 (18-88)	8	100	13
Baudin et al[116], 2012	19.8 ± 15.7	48	100	29
Tong et al[101], 2012	PCD only = 30.74 ± 5.67; PCD + surgery = 27.80 ± 6.00	34	100	0 and 7
Pascual et al[117], 2013	28 ± 17	13	100	23
Wroński et al[102], 2013	PCD only = 33 (27-46); surgery = 35 (8-116)	18	100	0 and 17
Wang et al[118], 2016	11.7 ± 8.1	59	100	18.6
Infected or sterile necrotic collection
Lee et al[103], 2007	10 (1-58)a	23	12	4
Bruennler et al[119], 2008	3.5 (median 7)	80	65	23
van Santvoort et al[99], 2010	30 (11-71)a	43	91	19
Kumar et al[104], 2014	36.4 ± 7	12	67	8
Bellam et al[120], 2019	Median: 20 d	51	33.3	29.4
Gupta et al[121], 2020	Median: 22 d (range: 3–267 d)	146	47.9	20.5
Lu et al[105], 2020	15.26 ± 7.08	43	86	13.9
	50.86 ± 19.58	55	56.3	10.9
Sterile necrotic collection
Walser et al[122], 2006	NR	22	0	9.1

^aSome patients underwent endoscopic transluminal drainage.

IPN: Infectious pancreatic necrosis; NR: Not reported; PCD: Percutaneous catheter drainage.