Controversies in the management of acute pancreatitis: An update

Table 10 Outcome on endoscopic drainage of a pancreatic collection with various types of stents

Ref.	Collection	n	Success
Lee et al[124], 2014	WON and pseudocyst	PS = 25; FCMS = 25	PS: 90%; FCMS: 87%
Mukai et al[125], 2015	WON	PS = 27; BFMS = 43	PS: 90.6%; FCMS: 97.7%
Siddiqui et al[126], 2017	WON	PS = 106 FCMS = 121; LAMS = 86	PS: 81%; FCMS: 95%; LAMS: 90%
Bapaye et al[127], 2016	WON	PS = 61; BFMS = 72	PS: 73.7%; BFMS: 94.0%
Bang et al[123], 2019	WON	PS = 29; LAMS = 31	PS: 96.6%; LAMS: 93.5%
Muktesh et al[128], 2022	WON 108	PS = 45; BFMS = 53	PS: 81.8%; BFMS: 96.2%

BFMS: Biflanged metal stent; FCMS: Fully covered self-expandable metal stent; LAMS: Lumen-apposing metal stent; PS: Plastic stent; WON: Walled-off necrosis.