Identification and predictive analysis for participants at ultra-high risk of psychosis: A comparison of three psychometric diagnostic interviews

doi:10.12998/wjcc.v10.i8.2420

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 10, Issue 8

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (3198)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

157

WORD

HTML

1522

Tables (1-5)

255

Sum=2007

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

206

Download

391

Sum=597

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

231

Download

363

Sum=594

Mar 16, 2022 (publication date) through May 19, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (2)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Clinical Cases

ISSN

2307-8960

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Clinical Trials Study

World J Clin Cases. Mar 16, 2022; 10(8): 2420-2428
Published online Mar 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i8.2420

Table 5 Transition rates of at risk of psychosis participants to within 2 years

	UHR+	Outcomes after 2 years follow-up		Transition rates, %
		Psychosis	No psychosis
CAARMS	12	2	10	16.7
SIPS	10	1	9	10
BSABS	17	3	14	17.7

CAARMS: Comprehensive assessment of at-risk mental states; SIPS: Structured interview for psychosis-risk syndrome; BSABS: Bonn scale for the assessment of basic symptoms; UHR+: At risk of psychosis.

Citation: Wang P, Yan CD, Dong XJ, Geng L, Xu C, Nie Y, Zhang S. Identification and predictive analysis for participants at ultra-high risk of psychosis: A comparison of three psychometric diagnostic interviews. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(8): 2420-2428
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i8/2420.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i8.2420