Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 16, 2022; 10(5): 1517-1526
Published online Feb 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i5.1517
Published online Feb 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i5.1517
Table 5 Comparison of urinary incontinence between two groups, n (%)
| Group | Number of cases | Urinary incontinence | Duration of urinary incontinence | |||||
| Mild | Moderate | Severe | Total | < 1 wk | 1 wk-4 wk | > 4 wk | ||
| Control group | 65 | 10 (40.00) | 11 (44.00) | 4 (16.00) | 25 (38.46) | 13 (52.00) | 8 (32.00) | 4 (16.00) |
| Observation group | 65 | 7 (50.00) | 5 (35.71) | 2 (14.29) | 14 (21.54) | 9 (64.29) | 5 (35.71) | 0 (0.00) |
| χ2 | 4.322 | 2.517 | ||||||
| P value | 0.035 | 0.284 | ||||||
- Citation: Zheng XC, Luo TT, Cao DD, Cai WZ. Effect of precise nursing service mode on postoperative urinary incontinence prevention in patients with prostate disease. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(5): 1517-1526
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i5/1517.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i5.1517