Effect of precise nursing service mode on postoperative urinary incontinence prevention in patients with prostate disease

Table 3 Comparison of urinary flow mechanics index, international prostate system score and incontinence quality of life questionnaire score in the two groups (mean ± SD)

Group		Control group (n = 65)	Observation group (n = 65)	t	P value
MUCP (cmH2O)	Preoperative	24.12 ± 4.33	24.05 ± 4.56	0.09	0.929
	Postoperative	25.69 ± 4.13	25.47 ± 4.32	0.297	0.767
RUV (mL)	Preoperative	74.21 ± 15.66	73.25 ± 16.74	0.338	0.736
	Postoperative	16.23 ± 3.21a	13.14 ± 2.57a	6.058	0
Qmax (mL/s)	Preoperative	4.26 ± 1.23	4.31 ± 1.27	0.228	0.82
	Postoperative	11.45 ± 2.03a	13.65 ± 2.41a	5.629	0
IPSS score	Preoperative	30.56 ± 4.63	31.02 ± 4.81	0.555	0.58
	Postoperative	8.96 ± 1.56a	5.74 ± 1.04a	13.846	0
I-QOL score	Preoperative	40.43 ± 4.52	40.68 ± 5.06	0.297	0.767
	Postoperative	48.74 ± 3.62a	51.14 ± 3.05a	4.088	0

^aP < 0.05 vs the pre-operation of this group.

MUCP: Maximum closed urethral pressure; RUV: Residual urine volume; Qmax: Maximum urinary flow rate; IPSS: International prostate system score; I-QOL: Incontinence quality of life questionnaire score.