Randomized Controlled Trial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2022; 10(24): 8615-8624
Published online Aug 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8615
Table 3 Comparison between the conventional mask group and the high-flow nasal cannula oxygen group after the intervention

Conventional mask group (n = 30)
HFNCO group (n = 30)
P value
5 min after extubation
HR76.0 ± 12.871.3 ± 11.00.138
MAP108.3 (99.0, 120.5)105.5 (96.3, 115.1)0.4731
SpO2100.0 (97.8, 100.0)100.0 (100.0, 100.0)0.0321
15 min after extubation
HR76.6 ± 12.771.4 ± 10.50.091
MAP108.5 (96.0, 121.9)105.3 (95.9, 118.6)0.6201
SpO2100.0 (98.0, 100.0)100.0 (100.0, 100.0)0.0011
30 min after extubation
HR75.9 ± 13.170.3 ± 8.80.054
MAP107.5 (97.0, 117.6)111.0 (100.3, 117.8)0.6731
SpO2100.0 (98.8, 100.0)100.0 (100.0, 100.0)0.0021
1 h after extubation
HR76.5 ± 13.671.0 ± 9.20.073
MAP105.8 (97.3, 119.1)107.5 (110.5, 121.0)0.6471
SpO2100.0 (99.0, 100.0)100.0 (100.0, 100.0)0.0031
pH7.36 (7.34, 7.38)7.36 (7.33, 7.37)0.6521
paCO244.0 (40.1, 48.2)45.3 (41.8, 49.8)0.7061
paO2114.0 (83.5, 147.6)194.9 (162.9, 242.2)< 0.0011
Glucose8.3 (6.5 ,8.9)7.6 (6.5, 8.7)0.5691
Lactic acid1.4 (1.1, 1.7)1.4 (1.1, 1.8)0.9411