Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 14, 2022; 10(2): 511-517
Published online Jan 14, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i2.511
Table 3 Comparison of sex hormone levels, uterine volume, and sex life quality scores between the two groups
Group
Observation group (n = 56)
Control group (n = 63)
t value
P value
E2 (pg/mL)45.50 ± 7.1342.91 ± 8.101.8410.068
FSH (mIU/mL)13.60 ± 3.2414.54 ± 3.11-1.6140.109
LH (mIU/mL)15.11 ± 2.0814.60 ± 3.550.9410.349
Uterine volume (cm3)Before placement120.33 ± 6.93119.28 ± 8.030.7590.449
1 mo after placement122.10 ± 9.10121.28 ± 8.280.5150.608
6 mo after placement121.15 ± 8.82122.02 ± 9.11-0.5280.599
Sexual life quality scoresSexual desire (points)25.68 ± 2.1025.10 ± 2.811.2620.209
Sexual activity (points)38.28 ± 4.4838.10 ± 5.210.2010.841
Sexual satisfaction (points)30.20 ± 3.1029.82 ± 2.880.6930.49