Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 7, 2022; 10(1): 177-188
Published online Jan 7, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i1.177
Table 2 Brainstem reflexes compared by degree of neurocognitive disorder
Latency
Subgroup
ND
Mild (n = 14)
Moderate (n = 19)
Severe (n = 14)
LeftR1 (ms)All (n = 47)12.0 (10.4-12.8)12.0 (10.8-12.5)11.6 (10.5-12.8)
With T2DM (n = 21)12.1 (10.4-12.4)12.2 (10.8-12.6)10.9 (10.3-11.7)
Without T2DM (n = 26)12.4 (10.1-13.8)12.0 (11.2-12.4)12.8 (11.1-14.3)
R2 (ms)All (n = 47)36.3 (28.5-38.0)37.7 (35.6-41.4)39.0 (37.9-41.2)
With T2DM (n = 21)28.5 (26.3-35.2)1,240.6 (36.0-43.8)39.1 (38.4-41.2)b
Without T2DM (n = 26)37.8 (37.5-41.4)37.3 (34.5-40.1)38.1 (37.4-43.8)
R2c (ms)All (n = 47)36.4 (30.8-39.3)37.8 (36.7-40.9)39.0 (37.4-41.3)
With T2DM (n = 21)30.8 (24.3-35.2)238.0 (37.1-40.9)39.3 (37.7-41.3)a
Without T2DM (n = 26)39.3 (37.7-44.8)37.0 (35.6-40.0)38.1 (37.4-43.4)
RightR1 (ms)All (n = 47)11.5 (10.8-11.7)12.3 (11.5-12.8)38.4 (3.6-40.2)
With T2DM (n = 21)11.0 (10.3-11.5)11.7 (10.2-12.4)11.1 (10.4-12.2)
Without T2DM (n = 26)11.7 (11.5-12.3)12.5 (11.5-12.8)11.9 (11.1-12.3)
R2 (ms)All (n = 47)36.0 (29.4-37.1)238.4 (34.7-41.3)38.0 (37.6-40.9)a
With T2DM (n = 21)29.4 (24.6-34.4)1,238.4 (36.7-41.3)37.6 (37.2-39.9)b
Without T2DM (n = 26)37.1 (36.3-38.6)38.5 (33.2-40.8)39.8 (37.9-43.2)
R2c (ms)All (n = 47)35.9 (27.9-39.0)38.3 (35.7-40.4)38.0 (37.6-40.9)
With T2DM (n = 21)27.9 (26.4-33.5)238.7 (36.7-40.4)37.7 (36.9-40.9)a
Without T2DM (n = 26)38.3 (36.4-39.0)37.5 (33.1-40.4)38.0 (37.7-42.8)
Masseter reflex (ms)All (n = 30)4.3 (3.1-4.8)4.5 (3.4-5)4.5 (3.0-5.1)
With T2DM (n = 21)4.2 (4.1-4.4)4.5 (2.8-5.2)4.5 (3.0-5.1)
Without T2DM (n = 9)4.5 (3.1-4.8)4.3 (3.5-4.9)-