Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Nephrol. May 6, 2017; 6(3): 86-99
Published online May 6, 2017. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v6.i3.86
Table 3 Major studies comparing low-osmolal and iso-osmolal contrast media in terms of renal safety
Ref.Baseline renal functions/patient populationProcedure/administration routeCompared drugsAim of the study/primary end pointsResults
Feldkamp et al[94]Normal GFRPTCA (intra-arterial)Iodixanol (IOCM) vs Iopromide (LOCM)≥ 25% increase in SCr at 48 hNo difference
Hardiek et al[95]Normal GFR, diabetic patientsPTCA (intra-arterial)Iodixanol (IOCM) vs Iopamidol (LOCM)≥ 25% increase in SCr days 1, 3 and 7No difference
Aspelin et al[96] (NEPHRIC)CKD, diabetic patientsPTCA (intra-arterial)Iodixanol (IOCM) vs Iohexol (LOCM)Peak increase in SCr day 0–3Iso-osmolal safer than low-osmolal CM
Jo et al[97] (RECOVER)CKDPTCA (intra-arterial)Iodixanol (IOCM) vs Ioxaglate (LOCM)Increase in SCr ≥ 25% or ≥ 0.5 mg/dL within 2 dIso-osmolal safer than low-osmolal CM
Solomon et al[98] (CARE)CKDPTCA (intra-arterial)Iodixanol (IOCM) vs Iopamidol (LOCM)Increase in SCr > 0.5 mg/dL at 45-120 hNo difference
Rudnick et al[99] (VALOR)CKDPTCA (intra-arterial)Iodixanol (IOCM) vs Ioversol (LOCM)Increase in SCr > 0.5 mg/dL within 72 hNo difference
Barrett et al[8] (IMPACT)CKDCT (intravenous)Iodixanol (IOCM) vs Iopamidol (LOCM)Increase in SCr > 0.5 mg/dL or ≥ 25% at 48–72 hNo difference
Kuhn et al[100] (PREDICT)CKDCT (intravenous)Iodixanol (IOCM) vs Iopamidol (LOCM)Increase in SCr > 0.5 mg/dL within 48-72 hNo difference
Thomsen et al[101] (ACTIVE)CKDCT (intravenous)Iodixanol (IOCM) vs Iomeprol (LOCM)Increase in SCr > 0.5 mg/dL at 48-72 hLow-osmolal safer than iso-osmolal CM
Nguyen et al[102]CKDCT (intravenous)Iodixanol (IOCM) vs Iopromide (LOCM)Peak rise in SCr days 1-3Iso-osmolal safer than low-osmolal CM
Wessely et al[103]CKDPTCA (intra-arterial)Iodixanol (IOCM) vs İomeprol (LOCM)Peak increase in SCrNo difference