Renal functional and surgical outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for hilar vs non-hilar tumors: Trifecta and pentafecta evaluation

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors predicting trifecta achievement

	Univariate analysis			Multivariate analysis
	OR	95%CI	P value	OR	95%CI	P value
Age ≥ 66	0.697	0.442-1.10	0.122
Male	0.940	0.569-1.55	0.810
BMI ≥ 24	0.671	0.425-1.06	0.087
ECOG-PS ≥ 1	0.636	0.335-1.21	0.167
Diabetes mellitus	0.798	0.48-1.33	0.385
Hypertension	0.855	0.542-1.35	0498
Preoperative CKD stage ≥ 3	0.558	0.345-0.905	0.018	0.578	0.354-0.942	0.028a
Surgeon’s experience ≥ 20 cases	1.270	0.788-2.05	0.327
R score ≥ 2	0.478	0.29-0.788	0.004b	0.492	0.297-0.814	0.006b
E score ≥ 3	0.864	0.497-1.50	0.606
N score ≥ 3	0.624	0.369-1.06	0.079
L score ≥ 3	0.782	0.493-1.24	0.297
Intra approach	1.01	0.633-1.61	0.974
Hilar tumor	1.03	0.575-1.84	0.921	0.965	0.534-1.75	0.907
RENAL score ≥ 10	0.666	0.356-1.22	0.185

^aP < 0.05.

^bP < 0.01.

OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval; BMI: Body mass index; ECOG-PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, CKD: Chronic kidney disease.