Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Nephrol. Jun 25, 2026; 15(2): 117719
Published online Jun 25, 2026. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v15.i2.117719
Published online Jun 25, 2026. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v15.i2.117719
Table 3 Survival modeling approaches for kidney failure prediction and comparative performance
| Model type | Data inputs | Competing risks handled | Typical performance | Comparator | Key advantage | Ref. |
| Traditional Cox | Baseline labs | Rarely | C-index 0.65-0.75 | KFRE | Simplicity | [39] |
| KFRE | Static clinical variables | No | C-index 0.70-0.80 | Widely adopted | [39] | |
| ML survival (RSF, DeepSurv) | Longitudinal labs | Yes | C-index 0.75-0.88 | Cox, KFRE | Dynamic risk | [40] |
| Multimodal ML | Labs + imaging ± genomics | Yes | +0.03-0.07 C-index gain | Lab-only ML | Rapid progressor ID | [46] |
- Citation: Eskandar K. Artificial intelligence in chronic kidney disease: Early detection, risk prediction, and personalized treatment strategies. World J Nephrol 2026; 15(2): 117719
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v15/i2/117719.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v15.i2.117719