BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Nephrol. Jun 25, 2026; 15(2): 117336
Published online Jun 25, 2026. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v15.i2.117336
Table 2 Technique considerations in performing percutaneous kidney biopsy
Biopsy step
Technical point
Ultrasound viewsGuidance using a short-axis (‘out-of-plane’) view is uncommon because of poorer needle tracking, although results were similar between short- and long-axis approaches in observational studies[39]
A short-axis window might be helpful, for instance, in situations where biopsy is performed laterally from the patient’s flank or where a vertical needle trajectory is used
PositioningThe prone position is almost universal for percutaneous kidney biopsy. It is comfortable for patients and ergonomic for the proceduralist
Less common positions include seated or lateral decubitus. Retrospective reports showed kidney biopsy to be safe and effective in these alternative positions[40-42]
In exceptional circumstances like pregnant or mechanically ventilated patients, any position deemed to optimise tolerability and needle view on ultrasound can be used[43]
The biopsy may be performed with the patient’s breath held in either of inhalation or exhalation in order to facilitate a safe path to the kidney
Needle insertion methodThere are two needle systems that are commonly used for percutaneous biopsy: A freehand technique, as described in the main text, or a coaxial technique
In the coaxial method, a hollow trocar needle is advanced to the kidney and its tip placed at the renal capsule. The thinner needle of a spring-loaded biopsy gun can then be introduced repeatedly through the trocar as required
Possible advantages of the coaxial method include consistency when needle visualisation is difficult, less soft tissue trauma, and the ability to inject haemostatic pledgets to seal the biopsy tract. An advantage of the freehand method is flexibility to redirect the needle trajectory with each pass
In a trial of 166 patients randomised to a coaxial or non-coaxial needle technique, there was a higher average yield of glomeruli (18 vs 9, P < 0.01) and a significantly shorter procedural time (5 minutes vs 14 minutes, P < 0.01) in the coaxial group, but no differences in the rates of major haemorrhage or in the likelihood of positively determining a diagnosis[44]
Needle trajectoryThe trajectory of the biopsy tract and needle must account for the kidney’s anatomy, movement with respiration, and closeness to surrounding organs
The needle tangent should ensure that the biopsy throw length remains entirely in renal cortex, minimizing the likelihood of inadvertently puncturing hilar vessels or medulla
The main text outlines the most common approach to the kidney lower pole cortex. Various alternative trajectories are also possible, with no high-quality data favouring any specific approach
LateralityThe left kidney is more frequently biopsied than the right
The right kidney can be obscured by overlying liver
Where embolisation is required for biopsy-induced haemorrhage, trans-arterial selective catheterisation of the left renal artery is anecdotally easier than the right
Comparative studies are absent


Write to the Help Desk