Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Nephrol. Mar 25, 2026; 15(1): 117950
Published online Mar 25, 2026. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v15.i1.117950
Published online Mar 25, 2026. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v15.i1.117950
Table 3 Key recent trials on steroids in interstitial nephritis
| Ref. | Design/N | Patient population | Steroid regimen | Key outcome(s) | Notes/limitations |
| Systematic review & meta-analysis | |||||
| Quinto et al[15], 2019 | Systematic review, 8 retrospective studies, 430 patients (approximately 300 steroid vs approximately 130 non-steroid) | Drug-induced AIN | Prednisone approximately 40-60 mg daily (5 studies); IV methylprednisolone approximately 1 mg/kg in two studies; duration 1.5-12 weeks | Mixed: Four studies showed benefit of steroids on SCrt, four did not. No meta-analysis due to heterogeneity | High risk of bias. Retrospective. Comparator arms poorly defined |
| Yu et al[18], 2025 | Systematic review, 3 RCT, 4 case series, 16 retrospective case series (total 1205 patients; 952 received steroid treatment) | Biopsy-proven AIN (not necessarily exclusively drug-induced) | Oral prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day with slow taper over several weeks or IV methylprednisolone pulse therapy for 2 days to 3 days before oral prednisolone. One study used MMF as steroid sparing agent | Mixed: Eight studies showed improved renal function with steroids, whereas another eight found no significant difference. Meta-analysis of 3 RCT: Overall effect size is -2.24, with a confidence interval of -2.82 to -1.67 | High risk of bias. Retrospective. Adverse effects of steroid is probably under-reported |
| RCTs | |||||
| Ramachandran et al[20], 2015 | Randomized (though small) trial. n = 29 (16 oral pred vs 13 pulse + oral) | Biopsy-proven. DI-AIN | Group 1: Oral prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day × 3 weeks then taper. Group 2: Methylprednisolone IV 30 mg/kg/day × 3 days then prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day orally × 2 weeks, then taper | At 3 months: CR (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/minute/1.73 m²) in 50% (Group 1) vs 61% (Group 2); no statistically significant difference | Small N. Short follow-up period of 3 months. No control group. Limited generalizability |
| Chowdry et al[17], 2018 | Randomized (though small) trial. n = 31 (16 oral pred vs 15 pulse + oral) | Biopsy-proven AIN | Group A: Oral pred 1 mg.kg/day × 2 weeks. Group B: IV methylprednisolone 30 mg/kg/day × 3 followed by oral pred 1 mg/kg/day × 2 weeks with 2 weeks taper | No statistical difference in outcome: Complete remission (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/minute/1.73 m²) 56.2% (Group A) vs 60% (Group B). Additional 44% in Group A & 40% in Group B achieved partial remission (improvement but eGFR < 60 mL/minute/1.73 m2) | Small N. No control group. Limited generalizability |
| Retrospective | |||||
| González et al[21], 2008 | Multicenter retrospective. n = 61 (52 steroid-treated) | Biopsy-proven DI-AIN | Steroids started within approximately 2 weeks vs later (approximately 34 days) - dose not fully standardized | Treated patients had significantly lower final serum creatinine; earlier initiation correlated with better recovery | Retrospective. Modest size. Timing confounded by other factors |
| Fernandez-Juarez et al[23], 2018 | Retrospective (n = 182 from 13 centers | Biopsy-proven DI-AIN- all treated with steroids | Compared treatment durations: High-dose for 3 weeks vs > 8 weeks | At 6 months: Mean recovered GFR approximately 34 mL/minute/1.73 m²; longer high-dose (> 3 weeks) or > 8 weeks duration not associated with better recovery. Delay in steroid initiation and interstitial fibrosis > 50% on biopsy strongly predicted worse outcomes (OR for fibrosis approximately 8.7) | No control group. Retrospective. Mixed durations & dosage |
| Prendecki et al[16], 2017 | Retrospective: n = 187 (158 treated with steroids, 29 untreated) | Biopsy-proven AIN (not necessarily exclusively drug-induced) | Oral prednisolone (and a few with IV) | At 24 months: Median eGFR in steroid group 43 mL/minute vs 24 mL/minute in untreated (P = 0.01). Dialysis-dependence by 6 months: 3.2% steroid vs 20.6% untreated (P = 0.0022). By 24 months: 5.1% vs 24.1% (P = 0.0019) | Non-randomized. Potential for selection bias (sicker patients might not have been treated) |
| Rodelo-Ceballos et al[19], 2025 | Retrospective: n = 139 (101 treated with GC) | Biopsy-proven AIN (various etiologies) | GC therapy; earlier initiation (≤ 7 days) vs later | GC-treated group had significantly greater delta SCrt reduction (-2.3 mg/dL; 95%CI: -3.6 to -1.1) & lower permanent dialysis-dependence at 6 months (11% vs 54%) in treated group. Multivariate: GC therapy independent predictor of improved kidney function (adj SCrt: -1.47 mg/dL; 95%CI: -2.68 to -0.27) | Retrospective. Single center cohort. Possible residual confounding |
- Citation: Sinha Ray A, Errabelli P, Mareedu N, Lathiya MK. Renal tubular acidosis complication of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs induced interstitial nephritis and its complete resolution with steroids: A case report. World J Nephrol 2026; 15(1): 117950
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v15/i1/117950.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v15.i1.117950