BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Case Report
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Nephrol. Mar 25, 2026; 15(1): 117950
Published online Mar 25, 2026. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v15.i1.117950
Table 3 Key recent trials on steroids in interstitial nephritis
Ref.
Design/N
Patient population
Steroid regimen
Key outcome(s)
Notes/limitations
Systematic review & meta-analysis
Quinto et al[15], 2019Systematic review, 8 retrospective studies, 430 patients (approximately 300 steroid vs approximately 130 non-steroid)Drug-induced AINPrednisone approximately 40-60 mg daily (5 studies); IV methylprednisolone approximately 1 mg/kg in two studies; duration 1.5-12 weeksMixed: Four studies showed benefit of steroids on SCrt, four did not. No meta-analysis due to heterogeneityHigh risk of bias. Retrospective. Comparator arms poorly defined
Yu et al[18], 2025Systematic review, 3 RCT, 4 case series, 16 retrospective case series (total 1205 patients; 952 received steroid treatment)Biopsy-proven AIN
(not necessarily exclusively drug-induced)
Oral prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day with slow taper over several weeks or IV methylprednisolone pulse therapy for 2 days to 3 days before oral prednisolone. One study used MMF as steroid sparing agentMixed: Eight studies showed improved renal function with steroids, whereas another eight found no significant difference. Meta-analysis of 3 RCT: Overall effect size is -2.24, with a confidence interval of -2.82 to -1.67High risk of bias. Retrospective. Adverse effects of steroid is probably under-reported
RCTs
Ramachandran et al[20], 2015Randomized (though small) trial. n = 29 (16 oral pred vs 13 pulse + oral)Biopsy-proven. DI-AINGroup 1: Oral prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day × 3 weeks then taper. Group 2: Methylprednisolone IV 30 mg/kg/day × 3 days then prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day orally × 2 weeks, then taperAt 3 months: CR (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/minute/1.73 m²) in 50% (Group 1) vs 61% (Group 2); no statistically significant differenceSmall N. Short follow-up period of 3 months. No control group. Limited generalizability
Chowdry et al[17], 2018Randomized (though small) trial. n = 31 (16 oral pred vs 15 pulse + oral)Biopsy-proven AINGroup A: Oral pred 1 mg.kg/day × 2 weeks. Group B: IV methylprednisolone 30 mg/kg/day × 3 followed by oral pred 1 mg/kg/day × 2 weeks with 2 weeks taperNo statistical difference in outcome: Complete remission (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/minute/1.73 m²) 56.2% (Group A) vs 60% (Group B). Additional 44% in Group A & 40% in Group B achieved partial remission (improvement but eGFR < 60 mL/minute/1.73 m2)Small N. No control group. Limited generalizability
Retrospective
González et al[21], 2008Multicenter retrospective. n = 61 (52 steroid-treated)Biopsy-proven DI-AINSteroids started within approximately 2 weeks vs later (approximately 34 days) - dose not fully standardizedTreated patients had significantly lower final serum creatinine; earlier initiation correlated with better recoveryRetrospective. Modest size. Timing confounded by other factors
Fernandez-Juarez et al[23], 2018Retrospective (n = 182 from 13 centersBiopsy-proven DI-AIN- all treated with steroidsCompared treatment durations: High-dose for 3 weeks vs > 8 weeksAt 6 months: Mean recovered GFR approximately 34 mL/minute/1.73 m²; longer high-dose (> 3 weeks) or > 8 weeks duration not associated with better recovery. Delay in steroid initiation and interstitial fibrosis > 50% on biopsy strongly predicted worse outcomes (OR for fibrosis approximately 8.7)No control group. Retrospective. Mixed durations & dosage
Prendecki et al[16], 2017Retrospective: n = 187 (158 treated with steroids, 29 untreated)Biopsy-proven AIN (not necessarily exclusively drug-induced)Oral prednisolone (and a few with IV)At 24 months: Median eGFR in steroid group 43 mL/minute vs 24 mL/minute in untreated (P = 0.01). Dialysis-dependence by 6 months: 3.2% steroid vs 20.6% untreated (P = 0.0022). By 24 months: 5.1% vs 24.1% (P = 0.0019)Non-randomized. Potential for selection bias (sicker patients might not have been treated)
Rodelo-Ceballos et al[19], 2025Retrospective: n = 139 (101 treated with GC)Biopsy-proven AIN (various etiologies)GC therapy; earlier initiation (≤ 7 days) vs laterGC-treated group had significantly greater delta SCrt reduction (-2.3 mg/dL; 95%CI: -3.6 to -1.1) & lower permanent dialysis-dependence at 6 months (11% vs 54%) in treated group. Multivariate: GC therapy independent predictor of improved kidney function (adj SCrt: -1.47 mg/dL; 95%CI: -2.68 to -0.27)Retrospective. Single center cohort. Possible residual confounding


Write to the Help Desk