Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Nephrol. Mar 25, 2026; 15(1): 116879
Published online Mar 25, 2026. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v15.i1.116879
Published online Mar 25, 2026. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v15.i1.116879
Table 8 Statistically significant variables at the 95% significance level from multivariate logistic regressions
| Data | Variable | Odds ratio | P value |
| DTR | |||
| Donor (D) | Age | 82.4 | < 0.01 |
| Transplant (T) | Cold ischemia time (hours) | 30.8 | 0.001 |
| Recipient (R) | Residual diuresis (mL/day) | 0.1 | 0.006 |
| Smoking (BV1 = no smoking) | 15.5 | 0.02 | |
| DR | |||
| Recipient (R) | Residual diuresis (mL/day) | 0.1 | 0.008 |
| Smoking (BV1 = no smoking) | 10.4 | 0.02 | |
| DT | |||
| Transplant (T) | Cold ischemia time (hours) | 28.9 | 0.001 |
| Donor (D) | Age | 60.8 | < 0.01 |
| D | |||
| Donor (D) | Age | 35.9 | < 0.01 |
- Citation: Salgado C, Gonzalez Cohens F, Vera FA, Ruiz R, Velasquez JD, Gonzalez FM. Prediction of graft outcomes after kidney transplantation: When standard statistics compare to machine learning techniques. World J Nephrol 2026; 15(1): 116879
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v15/i1/116879.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v15.i1.116879