Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Nephrol. Mar 25, 2026; 15(1): 116879
Published online Mar 25, 2026. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v15.i1.116879
Published online Mar 25, 2026. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v15.i1.116879
Table 7 Kruskal-Wallis P-values when comparing logistic regression to each Machine learning model independently
| Comparison | AUC-ROC P value | Accuracy P value | Sensitivity P value | Specificity P value |
| LR vs SVM | 0.2454 | 0.2396 | 0.0139 | 0.0778 |
| LR vs DET | 0.4678 | 0.2186 | 0.8845 | 0.3836 |
| LR vs RF | 0.3865 | 0.5516 | 0.6631 | 0.7715 |
| LR vs GB | 0.1913 | 0.2425 | 0.7728 | 0.1465 |
| LR vs XGB | 0.5637 | 0.2367 | 0.7728 | 0.6612 |
| LR vs MLP | 0.8845 | 0.7702 | 0.1804 | 0.0384 |
- Citation: Salgado C, Gonzalez Cohens F, Vera FA, Ruiz R, Velasquez JD, Gonzalez FM. Prediction of graft outcomes after kidney transplantation: When standard statistics compare to machine learning techniques. World J Nephrol 2026; 15(1): 116879
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v15/i1/116879.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v15.i1.116879