Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Nephrol. Mar 25, 2026; 15(1): 113474
Published online Mar 25, 2026. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v15.i1.113474
Published online Mar 25, 2026. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v15.i1.113474
Table 1 Different types of perioperative fluids in kidney transplantation
| Type of fluid | Pros | Cons |
| Normal saline | Less expensive, easily available, potassium free | Potentially hypertonic, Risk of hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis, hyperkalemia, decreased GFR and urine output, AKI, and DGF large volume infusion should be avoided |
| Low chloride solutions (e.g., Kabilyte, Plasm-Lyte A) | Physiologically like plasma, no risk of hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, and DGF. Fluid of choice during kidney transplant | More expensive than other crystalloids |
| Ringer lactate | Balanced crystalloid, isotonic, has buffering capacity, is cost-effective, and safe | Theoretical risk of lactic acidosis and hyperkalemia |
| Hydroxyethyl starch | Volume expander, easily available | Risk of AKI, renal replacement therapy, and coagulopathy |
| Albumin | Increases plasma oncotic pressure, antioxidant properties, immunomodulation, protection from ischemia-reperfusion injury, less requirement of crystalloids, and vasopressors | Increased cost, risk of allergic reactions, and disease transmission. No benefit or increased risk of volume-related complications in recipients with cardio-pulmonary compromise. Routine use is not recommended |
- Citation: Goyal VK, Shekhrajka P, Bhargava SK, Mittal S. Perioperative fluid management in kidney transplantation: What’s new and future directives? World J Nephrol 2026; 15(1): 113474
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v15/i1/113474.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v15.i1.113474