BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Nephrol. Mar 25, 2026; 15(1): 113474
Published online Mar 25, 2026. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v15.i1.113474
Table 1 Different types of perioperative fluids in kidney transplantation
Type of fluid
Pros
Cons
Normal saline Less expensive, easily available, potassium freePotentially hypertonic, Risk of hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis, hyperkalemia, decreased GFR and urine output, AKI, and DGF large volume infusion should be avoided
Low chloride solutions (e.g., Kabilyte, Plasm-Lyte A)Physiologically like plasma, no risk of hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, and DGF. Fluid of choice during kidney transplantMore expensive than other crystalloids
Ringer lactateBalanced crystalloid, isotonic, has buffering capacity, is cost-effective, and safeTheoretical risk of lactic acidosis and hyperkalemia
Hydroxyethyl starchVolume expander, easily availableRisk of AKI, renal replacement therapy, and coagulopathy
AlbuminIncreases plasma oncotic pressure, antioxidant properties, immunomodulation, protection from ischemia-reperfusion injury, less requirement of crystalloids, and vasopressorsIncreased cost, risk of allergic reactions, and disease transmission. No benefit or increased risk of volume-related complications in recipients with cardio-pulmonary compromise. Routine use is not recommended


Write to the Help Desk