BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Nephrol. Sep 25, 2025; 14(3): 108406
Published online Sep 25, 2025. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v14.i3.108406
Table 1 Comparison of saliva collection methods based on biomarker reliability, feasibility, and limitations
Collection method
Biomarker reliability
Feasibility
Major limitations
SpittingHighEasy and patient-friendlyInconsistent flow, variable technique
Passive droolModerate to highNon-invasive, simpleSlow collection, risk of evaporation
Stimulated (paraffin chewing)Moderate (flow-dependent dilution)Simple, cost-effectiveContamination risk, requires compliance, time-sensitive processing
Stimulated (parotid)Variable, biomarker-specificTargeted gland samplingInvasive, discomfort, specialized equipment needed
Oral rinseLow (due to dilution)Very easy and rapidDilution effect, unreliable concentrations
Salivette®ModerateStandardized device availableAbsorption variability, potential contamination


Write to the Help Desk