Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Nephrol. Jun 25, 2025; 14(2): 100092
Published online Jun 25, 2025. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v14.i2.100092
Published online Jun 25, 2025. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v14.i2.100092
Table 3 Univariate regression analysis of outcomes with respect to procedure, n (%)
Variable | n | Unadjusted OR | 95%CI | P value |
Success | ||||
RADAR (Ref) | 45 (95.74) | - | - | - |
Classical | 36 (76.59) | 0.145 | 0.030-0.699 | 0.016 |
Complication | ||||
RADAR (Ref) | 6 (12.8) | - | - | - |
Classical | 14 (29.8) | 2.899 | 1.004-8.372 | 0.049 |
Maturation time | ||||
RADAR (Ref) | 28.33 | - | - | - |
Classical | 37.78 | 18.874 | 15.136-22.613 | 0.001 |
- Citation: Sarangi SS, Kumar S, Bhirud DP, Singh M, Navriya SC, Choudhary GR, Sandhu AS. Radial artery deviation and reimplantation technique vs classical technique in arterio-venous fistula: A randomised control trial. World J Nephrol 2025; 14(2): 100092
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v14/i2/100092.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v14.i2.100092