Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Virology. May 12, 2015; 4(2): 78-95
Published online May 12, 2015. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v4.i2.78
Table 2 Synthetic antiviral compounds tested for anti- human enterovirus 71 activity
Synthetic antiviralsTestedMechanismAdvantagesDisadvantagesRef.
Pre-infection
PleconarilIn vivoPrevents attachment by binding to viral capsidHigh oral availabilityVaried capacity of inhibition[47-49]
BPROZIn vitroPrevents attachment by binding to viral capsidHigh oral availabilityResistant mutants[49-54]
Soluble andIn vitroPrevents attachmentN/AN/A[55-57]
anti-SCARB2/PSGL-1
LactoferrinIn vitro / in vivoPrevents entry by binding to VP1/ cellular receptorNo obvious side effects (animal)Mechanism not clear[58-62]
SuraminIn vitroPrevents attachmentMay inhibit other multiple stages ofMechanism not clear[63]
HEV71 life cycle
Peptides (SP40)In vitroPrevents attachment by bindingSmall size, high activity/specificity,Low bioavailability[64-66]
to glycosaminoglycanslow toxicity
Post-infection
RupintrivirIn vitro /in vivoInhibits viral 3C proteinLow quantity, low toxicity,Lack efficacy in natural infection[67,68]
high barrier for drug resistace
DTrip-22In vitroInhibits viral 3D polymerase activityBroad spectrum activityN/A[69]
Aurintricarboxylic acidIn vitroInhibits viral 3D polymerase activityN/AN/A[76-81]
NITD008In vitro / in vivoInhibits viral 3D polymerase activityMore potent than ribavirin in vivoMay have toxicity issue, resistant mutants[82,83]
SorafenibIn vitroBlock virus induced activation of ERK/p38Licensed for cancer treatmentN/A[84,85]
signalling pathways