Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Virol. Sep 25, 2026; 15(3): 121066
Published online Sep 25, 2026. doi: 10.5501/wjv.121066
Published online Sep 25, 2026. doi: 10.5501/wjv.121066
Table 2 Laboratory diagnostic methods for Junín virus infection
| Diagnostic method | Principle | Specimen | Optimal timing | Advantages | Limitations | Ref. |
| RT-PCR | Detection and amplification of Junín viral RNA after reverse transcription | Whole blood, serum, plasma, occasionally tissue samples | Early acute phase (first 7-10 days during viremia) | Highly sensitive and specific; rapid confirmation of active infection; widely used in reference laboratories | Requires specialized molecular equipment and trained personnel; contamination risk; limited availability in rural endemic settings | [2,4] |
| Real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) | Quantitative detection of viral RNA using fluorescent probes during amplification | Whole blood, serum, plasma | Early acute phase | Rapid and highly sensitive; allows quantification of viral load and monitoring of disease progression | Expensive instrumentation; requires advanced molecular laboratory infrastructure | [2,4] |
| Virus isolation | Cultivation of infectious virus in susceptible cell cultures (e.g., Vero cells) | Blood, serum, tissue samples | Early stage of infection when viremia is present | Gold standard for confirmation; enables viral characterization, sequencing, and research studies | Requires biosafety level-4 containment; slow and labor-intensive; high biohazard risk; rarely used for routine diagnosis | [2,3,13] |
| IgM ELISA | Detection of virus-specific IgM antibodies generated during the early immune response | Serum or plasma | From end of first week of illness onward | Indicates recent infection; relatively simple, cost-effective, and widely used for screening | Not suitable for very early infection; possible cross-reactivity with other arenaviruses | [2,4,8,9] |
| IgG ELISA | Detection of virus-specific IgG antibodies indicating immune response or past exposure | Serum or plasma | Late acute phase or convalescent stage | Useful for seroepidemiological studies, vaccine evaluation, and confirmation of seroconversion | Cannot diagnose early infection; often requires paired sera samples | [1,2,4,10] |
| Antigen detection assays | Detection of viral proteins using specific monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies | Blood, serum, plasma | Early phase of infection | Faster than serological tests; useful when molecular testing is unavailable | Lower sensitivity compared with PCR; limited commercial availability | [2,4,9] |
| Neutralization test (PRNT) | Measurement of virus-neutralizing antibodies capable of inhibiting viral infectivity | Serum | Convalescent phase | Highly specific; considered reference method for assessing protective immunity and vaccine response | Requires live virus and high-containment laboratory; technically demanding and time-consuming | [1,10,18,22,23] |
| Routine laboratory tests (supportive) | Detection of hematological and biochemical abnormalities associated with infection | Whole blood, urine | Any stage of illness | Supports clinical suspicion (e.g., thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, elevated liver enzymes, proteinuria) | Nonspecific; cannot confirm Junín virus infection | [4,8,9] |
- Citation: Karanam SK, Uppala PK, Kandra NV, Edhi S. Junín virus and Argentine haemorrhagic fever: Virology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and prevention strategies. World J Virol 2026; 15(3): 121066
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3249/full/v15/i3/121066.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5501/wjv.121066