BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Virol. Mar 25, 2026; 15(1): 118362
Published online Mar 25, 2026. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v15.i1.118362
Table 1 Comparative landscape of the human gut bacteriome and virome
Metric
Gut bacteriome
Gut virome
Numerical abundance1011-1012 cells per gram of feces109-1012 particles per gram of feces (VLPs)1
Biomass contributionMajor (99.9% microbial biomass)Minimal (< 0.1% of microbial biomass)
Universal genetic markerPresent (16S rRNA gene)None (Requires shotgun metagenomics)
Database maturityHigh (most sequences are identifiable)Low (40%-90% “viral dark matter”)2
Identification logicTaxonomy-based (16S) or functionalHomology-based or de novo assembly
Major constituentsBacteria, archaeaBacteriophages, eukaryotic viruses, archaeal viruses, and EVEs
Replication strategyPredominantly binary fissionLytic, lysogenic (prophages), and chronic
Pediatric trajectoryDiversity increases linearly with ageRichness often peaks in infancy and fluctuates
Study cost/complexityLower (standardized and high-throughput)Higher (requires enrichment and heavy compute)


Write to the Help Desk