©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Virol. Sep 25, 2025; 14(3): 109614
Published online Sep 25, 2025. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v14.i3.109614
Published online Sep 25, 2025. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v14.i3.109614
Table 1 Comparison of hepatitis C virus diagnostic methods
| Diagnostic method | Sample type | Turnaround time | Sensitivity/specificity | Equipment required | User level | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Enzyme immunoassay | Serum or plasma | 1–5 days | 95%-99%/98%-99% | Lab equipment, trained staff | Laboratory professionals | High accuracy; standard for screening | Requires lab setup; not suitable for remote areas |
| Nucleic acid test | Serum or plasma | 1–7 days | > 99%/> 99% | Advanced lab instruments | Laboratory professionals | Confirms active infection; gold standard | High cost; requires infrastructure |
| GeneXpert HCV RNA | Plasma or serum | About 1 h | 99%/99% | Portable cartridge-based system | Trained healthcare workers | Fast, decentralized testing | Expensive; less available in rural settings |
| OraQuick HCV self-test | Fingerstick or venous blood | About 20 min | 98%/100% | None | Layperson (self-testing) | Easy to use; no lab needed; WHO prequalified | Detects antibodies only; follow-up NAT needed |
- Citation: Saifullah M, Khan M, Usman MA, Mehmood Q, Mehdi AM. OraQuick hepatitis C virus self-test: A new frontier in hepatitis C screening. World J Virol 2025; 14(3): 109614
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3249/full/v14/i3/109614.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5501/wjv.v14.i3.109614