Review
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng.
World J Virol. Dec 12, 2012; 1(6): 174-183
Published online Dec 12, 2012. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v1.i6.174
Table 1 Pros and cons of each nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection
Nucleos(t)ide analogueRegimenProsCons
Lamivudine100 mg dailyFirst licensed agentHighest incidence of resistant mutations of M204V/I substitution (20% at year 1, 70% at year 5)
Well established safety and efficacy record
Lowest costAdverse effects including hepatitis flare ups, hepatic decompensation and even death
Adefovir dipivoxil10 mg dailyLow drug resistance rate, and no cross resistance with other nucleos(t)ide analogsIncidence of resistant mutations of N236T and/or A181V substitution (29% at year 5)
Adverse effects including renal tubular acidosis with hypophosphataemia when treatment is prolonged
Telbivudine600 mg dailyHigher seroconversion rateIncidence of resistant mutations of M204I mutation (5% at year 1)
Adverse effects including myopathy and neuropathy
Entecavir1.0 mg dailyAnti-HBV effectIncidence of resistant mutations of T184G or M250V (1.2% at year 5) (I169T and M250V, or T184G and S202I if also lamivudine-resistant)
Lowest rate of resistance
Most expensive
Tenofovir disoproxil300 mg dailyMore potent in reducing HBV load in patients with prior failure or resistance to lamivudine and/or adefovirNo resistant mutations reported at year 3