Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Virology. May 12, 2015; 4(2): 147-155
Published online May 12, 2015. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v4.i2.147
Figure 1
Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process. After careful discussion between the 3 reviewers, two outcomes were identified and included in the meta-analysis. HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus; ART: Antiretroviral therapy.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Meta-analysis of blood homocysteine concentration in human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects compared with healthy controls. Calculation based on random effects model. Results are expressed as weighted mean difference of homocysteine (µmol/L) and 95%CI. HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Meta-analysis of serum folate and vitamin B12 levels in human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects compared with healthy controls. Calculation based on random effects model. Results are expressed as weighted mean difference of folate (pg/mL) and vitamin B12 (pg/mL) and 95%CI.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Meta-analysis of blood homocysteine concentration in human immunodeficiency virus-infected exposed and non-exposed to antiretroviral therapy. Calculation based on random effects model. Results are expressed as weighted mean difference of homocysteine (µmol/L) and 95%CI. ART: Antiretroviral therapy.