©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Transplant. Oct 24, 2017; 7(5): 250-259
Published online Oct 24, 2017. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v7.i5.250
Published online Oct 24, 2017. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v7.i5.250
Table 4 International Myeloma Working Group Consensus guidelines and recommendations on mobilization in malignant lymphoma[20]
| Strategy | Recommendations |
| Mobilization | |
| G-CSF alone | Limit use to patients |
| Treated with ≤ 1 line of therapy | |
| Never exposed to melphalan | |
| Received ≤ 4 cycles of lenalidomide | |
| Use doses from 10-16 μg/kg per day | |
| Monitor PB CD34+ count | |
| Chemomobilization + G-CSF | Limit to patients who have not adequately responded to salvage therapy |
| Plerixafor | Suitable for all patients particularly if goals include |
| Highest cell yield obtainable | |
| Fewer apheresis sessions | |
| Remobilization | |
| Plerixafor | P + G-CSF or P + CM + G-CSF |
| Chemomobilization | Acceptable in patients who failed cytokine mobilization |
| Bone marrow harvest | Use as third-line option in patients in whom ASCT is compelling |
- Citation: Wallis WD, Qazilbash MH. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: Growth factors or chemotherapy? World J Transplant 2017; 7(5): 250-259
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v7/i5/250.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v7.i5.250