BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Transplant. Apr 24, 2017; 7(2): 103-116
Published online Apr 24, 2017. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v7.i2.103
Table 2 Papers on the effect of pharmacologic reflux treatment on transplant outcome
Ref.nPopulationTreatment typeAdjunctive treatmentsOutcomes assessed
Yates et al[32], 200520Post-LTx with diagnosis of BOS (n = 18) or potential BOS (n = 2)AZI 250 mg QOD from time of BOS diagnosis to time of manuscript writing (mean 6.25 mo)Immunosuppressive regimen, no additional antireflux agents specifiedEffect on FEV1
Verleden et al[110], 20048Post-LTx with significant decrease in their FEV1 attributed to BOSAZI 250 mg qd × 5 d then 250 mg po QODImmunosuppressive regimen, no additional antireflux agents specifiedEffect on FEV1
Verleden et al[111], 200614Post-LTx with BOSAZI 250 mg po qd × 5 d then AZI 250 mg po 3 × /wk × 3 moImmunosuppressive regimen, no additional antireflux agents specifiedReduction in airway neutrophilia and IL-8 mRNA, effect on FEV1
Mertens et al[112], 200912Post-LTx on AZI with pH monitoringAZI 250 mg PO 3 ×/wkImmunosuppressive regimen, held antireflux treatments × 1 wk prior to testingEffect on impedance-pH monitoring, gastric aspiration via BAL analysis
Blondeau et al[78], 200818Post-LTx on PPI vs off PPI at time of testing (secondary cohort)Omeprazole 20 mg PO BIDImmunosuppressive regimenPrevalence of reflux on objective testing, effect on aspiration in BAL


Write to the Help Desk