©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Transplant. Jun 24, 2016; 6(2): 255-271
Published online Jun 24, 2016. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i2.255
Published online Jun 24, 2016. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i2.255
Table 5 Advantages and disadvantages of enteric drainage of the exocrine secretions
| Advantages |
| Safety |
| Lower rates of urinary tract infections and urologic complications |
| More “physiologic”; fewer metabolic and volume problems |
| Fewer readmissions |
| Technical considerations |
| Treats exocrine insufficiency (in patients following total pancreatectomy or in patients with cystic fibrosis |
| Avoidance of need for enteric conversion; lower relaparotomy rate |
| Can be used with either systemic or portal venous outflow |
| Disadvantages |
| Safety |
| Higher incidence of leakage of pancreatic enzymes, pancreatitis, peri-pancreatic fluid collections |
| Higher incidence of intra-abdominal abscess, peritonitis, sepsis |
| Anastomotic leaks, GI bleeding |
| Increased risk of wound infections, wound healing problems (contaminated case with GI tract breach) |
| Technical considerations |
| Selective need for enterolysis or diverting Roux en y limb |
| Loss of direct access to anastomosis and allograft for diagnosis and treatment |
| Miscellaneous problems |
| Inability to directly monitor exocrine secretions |
- Citation: El-Hennawy H, Stratta RJ, Smith F. Exocrine drainage in vascularized pancreas transplantation in the new millennium. World J Transplant 2016; 6(2): 255-271
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v6/i2/255.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v6.i2.255