Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Transplant. Jun 24, 2015; 5(2): 38-43
Published online Jun 24, 2015. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v5.i2.38
Table 3 Comparison of old vs new allocation policies
Old kidney allocation system (effective 1988 - 12/3/2014)New kidney allocation system (effective 12/4/2014 onwards)
Wait list time starts from time of listingWait list time starts from time of listing or date of initiation of dialysis, whichever comes first
The quality of organs described based on the terms SCD, ECD and DCD kidneysThe quality of organs assessed by a KDPI score (0%-100%)
No metric was involved in allocating kidneys depending on the expected long- term outcomes of the transplant candidatesLongevity matching is used to allocate kidneys depending on the KDPI and EPTS scores
Only 4 priority points were given for HLA sensitization for a cPRA ≥ 80%Gradation of priority points given based on HLA sensitization for cPRA ≥ 20% range from 1-202, which can bring the recipient much higher on the list
Long wait time for blood group B candidatesIn order to decrease wait times for B blood group candidates, A2/A2B blood type donors acceptable
Pay back system presentPay back system eliminated
Priority given to pediatric candidates: share 35 (donor age < 35 yr)Pediatric candidates still get priority for kidneys with KDPI < 35%
National and regional sharing for sensitized patients was not mandatedNational, regional and local priority sharing of organs for highly sensitized patients with cPRA of 100%, 99% and 98% respectively
High discard rate existed for marginal ECD/ DCD kidneysRegional sharing of marginal kidneys (KDPI > 85%) is proposed