Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Transplant. Sep 18, 2026; 16(3): 121821
Published online Sep 18, 2026. doi: 10.5500/wjt.121821
Published online Sep 18, 2026. doi: 10.5500/wjt.121821
Table 5 Clusters’ stability comparison (full cohort vs machine perfusion subgroup)
| Cluster | Mean MPP (full cohort) | Median MPP (full cohort) | Mean entropy (full cohort) | Mean MPP (MP subgroup) | Median MPP (MP subgroup) | Mean entropy (MP subgroup) |
| 1 | 0.678 | 0.685 | 0.839 | 0.607 | 0.555 | 1.046 |
| 2 | 0.715 | 0.723 | 0.724 | 0.701 | 0.699 | 0.765 |
| 3 | 0.726 | 0.723 | 0.664 | 0.671 | 0.646 | 0.759 |
| 4 | 0.756 | 0.802 | 0.644 | 0.723 | 0.743 | 0.725 |
| 5 | 0.666 | 0.658 | 0.828 | 0.674 | 0.689 | 0.796 |
| 6 | 0.663 | 0.666 | 0.903 | 0.685 | 0.689 | 0.831 |
- Citation: Castellanos De Brigard J, Rangganata E, Papalois VE. Machine perfusion distribution across clinical phenotypes in kidney transplantation: A national cohort study using unsupervised clustering. World J Transplant 2026; 16(3): 121821
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v16/i3/121821.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.121821