BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Opinion Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Transplant. Sep 18, 2026; 16(3): 118000
Published online Sep 18, 2026. doi: 10.5500/wjt.118000
Table 1 Integrated comparison of induction strategies: Biological effects and long-term clinical consequences[1-5,19-26,28,30-34,42-45,53-57]
Domain
Alemtuzumab induction
Basiliximab induction
Core mechanismProfound pan-lymphocyte depletion (T cells, B cells, NK cells, monocytes) with prolonged immune reconstitutionSelective interleukin-2 receptor blockade on activated T cells; non-depleting
Early immunological controlVery strong suppression of early cellular alloimmune responsesAdequate suppression in matched, standard-risk recipients
Acute rejectionReduced or comparable rates in contemporary cohortsComparable rates in propensity-matched cohorts
Immune reconstitution trajectoryDelayed and non-physiological, driven by lymphopenia-induced proliferation and immune skewingPreserved immune architecture with gradual return to equilibrium
Humoral alloimmunityHigher incidence of de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies associated with B-cell regenerative dynamicsLower incidence of de novo donor-specific antibody formation
Viral susceptibilityIncreased risk of cytomegalovirus and BK viremia due to impaired immune surveillanceLower relative viral risk
Malignancy riskIncreased incidence observed with extended follow-up, reflecting impaired tumour surveillanceLower incidence
Graft functionInferior functional trajectory at defined time pointsMore stable long-term graft function
Death-censored graft lossHigher risk in propensity-matched cohortsLower risk
Overall long-term balanceEarly immunological gain offset by delayed biological and clinical costsModerated early suppression with improved long-term graft stability


Write to the Help Desk