Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Transplant. Jun 18, 2026; 16(2): 115035
Published online Jun 18, 2026. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v16.i2.115035
Published online Jun 18, 2026. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v16.i2.115035
Table 4 Practical algorithm for maintenance immunosuppression after liver transplantation
| Step | Patient factors/clinical scenario | Preferred regimen | Alternative regimen/key considerations |
| 1 | Standard risk (normal renal function, no specific comorbidities) | TAC + MMF ± steroids | CsA + MMF ± steroids: Monitor closely for CNI toxicity and NODAT |
| 2 | Renal dysfunction (eGFR < 60 mL/minute) or CNI toxicity | EVR + low-dose TAC | Everolimus + MMF (CNI-free): Reserved for patients with severe CNI intolerance due to higher rejection risk; monitor for proteinuria and wound healing |
| 3 | History of malignancy (e.g., HCC history, skin cancer) | Everolimus-based regimen | Sirolimus-based regimen: Leverage the antineoplastic effects of mTOR inhibitors to reduce recurrence risk |
| 4 | High immunological risk (e.g., autoimmune etiology, young age) | Induction with thymoglobulin followed by TAC + MMF | Standard triple therapy: Consider delayed CNI introduction to protect renal function during the perioperative phase |
| 5 | SLKT recipients (Simultaneous liver-kidney transplant) | Standard CNI-based regimen | Individualized approach: Therapy must be tailored to protect the kidney graft while preventing liver rejection |
- Citation: Sessa C, Gembillo G, Morale W. Rethinking chronic kidney disease risk after liver transplantation. World J Transplant 2026; 16(2): 115035
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v16/i2/115035.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v16.i2.115035