Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Transplant. Jun 18, 2026; 16(2): 115035
Published online Jun 18, 2026. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v16.i2.115035
Published online Jun 18, 2026. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v16.i2.115035
Table 2 Comparative profile of tacrolimus vs cyclosporine A post-liver transplantation
| Ref. | Clinical outcome | TAC profile (relative to CsA) | CsA profile (relative to TAC) | Supporting evidence type |
| Muduma et al[12], 2016 | Patient mortality | Superior/Lower risk | Higher risk | RCTs/meta-analysis |
| Muduma et al[12], 2016 | New-onset diabetes (NODAT) | Higher risk | Superior/Lower risk | RCTs/meta-analysis |
| Randhawa et al[11], 1997; Muduma et al[12], 2016 | Hypertension | Superior/Lower risk | Higher risk | RCTs/meta-analysis |
| Muduma et al[12], 2016 | Graft loss (overall) | Equivalent | Equivalent | RCTs/meta-analysis |
| Muduma et al[12], 2016 | Graft loss (HCV subgroup) | Higher risk | Superior/Lower risk | Meta-analysis |
- Citation: Sessa C, Gembillo G, Morale W. Rethinking chronic kidney disease risk after liver transplantation. World J Transplant 2026; 16(2): 115035
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v16/i2/115035.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v16.i2.115035