©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Transplant. Mar 18, 2026; 16(1): 114367
Published online Mar 18, 2026. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v16.i1.114367
Published online Mar 18, 2026. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v16.i1.114367
Table 4 Relative importance of pretransplant risk factors for acute rejection after kidney transplants[19]
| Risk factor | Reason for considering | Importance |
| Younger recipient age | Stronger immune response | ++ |
| Adolescent recipient | Higher risk for nonadherence | +++ |
| Donor age | Older organs: Higher immunogenicity | + |
| Recipient gender | Males: Fewer rejections | + |
| Ethnicity | African Americans: Significantly higher risk | +++ |
| Deceased vs living donor | Insignificant differences. DD: Insignificant differences between donation after cardiac vs brain death, or ECD vs SCD | + |
| Previous-transfusion | low immunologic responder: If unsensitized despite previous transfusion | + |
| Previous-transplantation | Unsensitized recipient: No significant increase in risk; early loss of previous graft to immunological causes → increased risk of next graft rejection | ++1 |
| Previous-pregnancy | Increasing risk with successive pregnancies | ++ |
| PRA > 0% (HLA antibodies) | Includes both historic and current PRA level HLA antibodies class I and/or class II | +++ |
| Preformed HLA, DSA (> 500 MFI) | Having no preformed HLA DSA at transplant: Low immunological risk. Low noncytotoxic HLA antibodies level: Intermediate risk. Required de novo HLA DSA posttransplant monitoring | ++++ |
| Sensitized patients after desensitization | Increased AMR risk, which may persist after desensitization in DSA-positive patients: Negative cytotoxicity and negative flow cross-match (low risk); flow cross-match (moderate increase in risk); positive cytotoxicity (profound increase in risk) | ++/+++ |
| HLA mismatch | Marked and well-documented effect on cellular and antibody-mediated rejection. Particularly pronounced for HLA DR mismatch | +++ |
| CMV1 mismatch | No association between CMV mismatch and acute rejection due to CMV prophylaxis | – |
| EBV1 mismatch | No effect per se on acute rejection | – |
| Cold ischemia time | Less important with current shorter ischemic times | + |
| Delayed graft function | Delayed function may prompt changes to the planned protocol in the first few days posttransplant | +++ |
- Citation: Kute VB, Balwani MR, Shrimali JB, Pasari A, Kher V, Patel MP, Chafekar D, Guditi S, Das P, Siddaiah GM, Godara SM, Bhargava V, Gupta A, Ramteke V, Deshpande N, Tolani P, Prasad N, Patil RK, Mohanka R, Mahajan S, Sharma S, Banerjee S, Engineer DP, Agarwal D, Kashiv P, Lahiri A, Khullar D, Srivastava A. Induction therapy in kidney transplant recipients: A consensus statement of Indian Society of Organ Transplantation. World J Transplant 2026; 16(1): 114367
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v16/i1/114367.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v16.i1.114367