BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Transplant. Mar 18, 2026; 16(1): 113034
Published online Mar 18, 2026. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v16.i1.113034
Table 8 Summary of findings (grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation) - robotic-assisted hepatectomy vs comparators in liver transplantation: Economic/resource outcomes - robotic vs comparators (as reported in Koh et al[23], 2024)
OutcomeEffect estimate (MD/OR/NMA contrast)Certainty (GRADE)Comments/footnotes
Total costs RLR vs OLR: MD -243.82 (-326.46 to -162.78)Low-moderateLess intraoperative blood loss with RLR vs OLR also reported
Total costs (LLR vs OLR)MD -217.48 (-282.44 to -154.94)Low-moderateKoh et al[23], 2024 network meta-analysis
Procedure costsRLR vs LLR: MD + 2310.17 (+812.98 to +3808.74)Low-moderateDowngrades: RoB (observational inputs); indirectness to transplant setting; currency/modeling heterogeneity1,2
Hospitalization costsRLR vs OLR: MD -3527.20 (-5760.20 to -1367.50)Low-moderateLower hospitalization costs for RLR vs OLR
TransfusionRLR vs OLR: OR 0.34 (0.17-0.66)Low-moderateKoh et al[23], 2024 NMA
Overall morbidityRLR vs OLR: OR 0.41 (0.26-0.59)Low-moderateLower morbidity vs OLR


Write to the Help Desk