©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Transplant. Mar 18, 2026; 16(1): 113034
Published online Mar 18, 2026. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v16.i1.113034
Published online Mar 18, 2026. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v16.i1.113034
Table 8 Summary of findings (grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation) - robotic-assisted hepatectomy vs comparators in liver transplantation: Economic/resource outcomes - robotic vs comparators (as reported in Koh et al[23], 2024)
| Outcome | Effect estimate (MD/OR/NMA contrast) | Certainty (GRADE) | Comments/footnotes |
| Total costs | RLR vs OLR: MD -243.82 (-326.46 to -162.78) | Low-moderate | Less intraoperative blood loss with RLR vs OLR also reported |
| Total costs (LLR vs OLR) | MD -217.48 (-282.44 to -154.94) | Low-moderate | Koh et al[23], 2024 network meta-analysis |
| Procedure costs | RLR vs LLR: MD + 2310.17 (+812.98 to +3808.74) | Low-moderate | Downgrades: RoB (observational inputs); indirectness to transplant setting; currency/modeling heterogeneity1,2 |
| Hospitalization costs | RLR vs OLR: MD -3527.20 (-5760.20 to -1367.50) | Low-moderate | Lower hospitalization costs for RLR vs OLR |
| Transfusion | RLR vs OLR: OR 0.34 (0.17-0.66) | Low-moderate | Koh et al[23], 2024 NMA |
| Overall morbidity | RLR vs OLR: OR 0.41 (0.26-0.59) | Low-moderate | Lower morbidity vs OLR |
- Citation: Ardila CM, González-Arroyave D, Ramírez-Arbelaez J. Robotic-assisted donor and recipient hepatectomy in liver transplantation: An umbrella review of clinical outcomes, surgical performance, and cost-effectiveness. World J Transplant 2026; 16(1): 113034
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v16/i1/113034.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v16.i1.113034