©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Transplant. Mar 18, 2026; 16(1): 113034
Published online Mar 18, 2026. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v16.i1.113034
Published online Mar 18, 2026. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v16.i1.113034
Table 7 Summary of findings (grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation) - robotic-assisted hepatectomy vs comparators in liver transplantation: Transplant recipients - robotic vs laparoscopic
| Outcome | Assumed risk (comparator per 1000) | Corresponding risk (robotic per 1000) | Effect [RR/MD (95%CI)] | Number of studies (participants) | Certainty (GRADE) | Comments/footnotes |
| Conversion to open | RD pooled (no baseline required) | -50 per 1000 | RR 0.41 (0.32-0.52); RD -0.05 | 24 studies; participants NR | Low-moderate | Pilz da Cunha et al[22], 2025; NNT = 20 |
| Overall morbidity (any complication) | RD pooled (no baseline required) | -20 per 1000 | RR 0.92 (0.84-1.00); RD -0.02 | 20 studies; participants NR | Low | Pilz da Cunha et al[22], 2025 (overall morbidity section) |
| Severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) | RD pooled (no baseline required) | -10 per 1000 | RR 0.81 (0.70, 0.94); RD ≈ -0.01 (NNT = 100) | 21 studies; participants NR | Low-moderate | Pilz da Cunha et al[22], 2025; NNT = 100 overall; subgroup major RD -0.03 |
| R0 resection rate | Not estimable (RD not provided) | Not estimable | RR 1.02 (1.01-1.03) | NR (multi-study) | Low | Pilz da Cunha et al[22], 2025 (counts not explicit in text extraction) |
| Readmission | RD pooled (no baseline required) | +10 per 1000 | RR 1.24 (1.09-1.41); RD +0.01 (0.00-0.01) | 20 studies; participants NR | Low | Pilz da Cunha et al[22], 2025 |
| Length of stay (days) | N/A (continuous outcome) | N/A (continuous outcome) | MD -0.27 (-0.67 to 0.12) | 26 studies; participants NR | Low | Pilz da Cunha et al[22], 2025 |
| 30-day or in-hospital mortality | Not estimable (RD not provided) | Not estimable (requires baseline risk) | RR 0.77 (0.51-1.15) | 20 studies; participants NR | Low | Pilz da Cunha et al[22], 2025 (30-day mortality) |
| Blood loss (mL) | N/A (continuous outcome) | N/A (continuous outcome) | No significant difference (overall) | NR | Low | Pilz da Cunha et al[22], 2025 (overall non-significant; subgroup differences exist) |
| Operative time (minutes) | N/A (continuous outcome) | N/A (continuous outcome) | MD +8.8 (-4.8 to 22) | 23 studies; participants NR | Low | Pilz da Cunha et al[22], 2025; high heterogeneity (I2 ≈ 90%) |
- Citation: Ardila CM, González-Arroyave D, Ramírez-Arbelaez J. Robotic-assisted donor and recipient hepatectomy in liver transplantation: An umbrella review of clinical outcomes, surgical performance, and cost-effectiveness. World J Transplant 2026; 16(1): 113034
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v16/i1/113034.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v16.i1.113034