©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Transplant. Mar 18, 2026; 16(1): 113034
Published online Mar 18, 2026. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v16.i1.113034
Published online Mar 18, 2026. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v16.i1.113034
Table 4 Recipients and economics (indirect evidence) - summary of findings and certainty (grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation): Economics (indirect)
| Economic outcome | Contrast | Effect, MD (95%CI/CrI) | Source | Certainty (GRADE) | Notes |
| Total costs | RLR vs OLR | -243.82 (-326.46 to -162.78) | Network meta-analysis (Koh et al[23], 2024) | Low-moderate | 1,2 |
| Total costs | LLR vs OLR | -217.48 (-282.44 to -154.94) | Network meta-analysis (Koh et al[23], 2024) | Low-moderate | 1,2 |
| Procedure costs | RLR vs LLR | +2310.17 (+812.98 to +3808.74) | Network meta-analysis (Koh et al[23], 2024) | Low-moderate | 1,2 |
| Hospitalization costs | RLR vs OLR | -3527.20 (-5760.20 to | Network meta-analysis (Koh et al[23], 2024) | Low-moderate | 1,2 |
- Citation: Ardila CM, González-Arroyave D, Ramírez-Arbelaez J. Robotic-assisted donor and recipient hepatectomy in liver transplantation: An umbrella review of clinical outcomes, surgical performance, and cost-effectiveness. World J Transplant 2026; 16(1): 113034
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v16/i1/113034.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v16.i1.113034