©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Transplant. Mar 18, 2026; 16(1): 111524
Published online Mar 18, 2026. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v16.i1.111524
Published online Mar 18, 2026. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v16.i1.111524
Table 5 Approach to prevent the development of antibody-mediated rejection in patients with preexisting donor-specific antibodies
| Type of donor | Type of crossmatch | Pre-transplant treatment | Induction and maintenance immunosuppression therapies | Monitoring after transplant |
| Patients with a potential living donor | Patients with a positive CDC crossmatch or a strongly positive flow crossmatch | Prefer to use KPD programs[74], rather than desensitization[75] | Appropriate for patients at high risk for the development of acute rejection (plasmapharesis/IVIG and glucocorticoids[77] | Routinely monitor DSA levels at months 1, 3, 6, and 12 post-transplant and then annually |
| Patients with positive C4d staining, plasmapheresis (two to three sessions), IVIG, and a single dose of rituximab 375 mg/m would be added | Perform kidney allograft biopsies in all patients who develop a de novo DSA | |||
| Patients with a positive virtual crossmatch1 or a mild to moderate flow crossmatch2 | Employ HLA desensitization strategies3[76] | Maintenance on a triple therapy4 | - | |
| Patients without a potential living donor | - | Employ HLA desensitization strategies strategies3 | - | - |
- Citation: Elahi T, Ahmed S, Mubarak M. Update on diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation. World J Transplant 2026; 16(1): 111524
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v16/i1/111524.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v16.i1.111524