Hyper-reduced grafts in living donor liver transplant: Techniques and outcomes

Table 1 Study features of donors and recipients

Ref.	Patients number, donor status	Mean age of donor (years)	Mean body weight of donor (kg)	Reduction technique and segment employed	Mean age of recipient (months)	Mean body weight of recipients (kg)
Strong et al[24]	1, DD	NR	65.0	MSG: III (BT)	4.0	4.7
Mentha et al[25]	1, DD	22	78.0	MSG: II (BT)	11.0	6.9
Srinivasan et al[14]	6, DD	8.8	33.7	RLLS: III (BT)	1.0	3.45
Noujaim et al[26]	2, DD	10.0	65.0	MSG: II (BT)	NR	2.60
Kasahara et al[8]	14, LD	32.0	61.1	HRLLS in-situ S: III, HRLLS in-situ S: II	7.0	5.95
Attia et al[27]	4, DD	46.5	64.5	HRLLS: III (BT)	2.8	4.90
Grabhorn et al[32]	10, DD	5.0	25.0	RLLS: 5, HRLLS: 4, (BT)	0.5	3.25
Enne et al[28]	12, LD	NR	NR	MSG: III	12.0	6.20
Thomas et al[30]	8, DD 1, LD	NR	NR	HRLLS: 9 (BT)	10.0	7.50
Shehata et al[3]	44, LD	34.0	NR	MSG III: 26 Reduced MS III: 18	7.0	5.45
Kanazawa et al[2]	31, LD	NR	NR	HRLLS (in-situ)	7.0	5.80
Sakamoto et al[20]	5, LD	36.0	66.6	MSG: II	5.0	6.20
Sanada et al[31]	13, LD	NR	NR	MSG II: 12 MSG III: 1	1.0	3.30
Kitajima et al[29]	89, LD	33.0	NR	HRLLS 47 MSG II: 42	7.3	5.90
Raices et al[33]	59, LD	31.0	69.0	HRLLS (BT)	14.0	8.00
Hirata et al[34]	25, LD	NR	NR	Medial reduction (in-situ)	10.0	7.10
Zakaria et al[35]	68, LD 6, DD	30.0	NR	LLS Split LLS	7.4	5.60
Malla et al[36]	7, LD	28.0	76.0	MSG	6.11	5.60

DD: Deceased donor; LD: Living donor; NR: Not reported; MSG: Monosegmental; BT: Back-table; HRLLS: Hyper-reduced left lateral sector; RLLS: Reduced left lateral sector.