©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Transplant. Dec 18, 2025; 15(4): 104589
Published online Dec 18, 2025. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.104589
Published online Dec 18, 2025. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.104589
Table 4 Psychosocial assessment scores for liver transplant candidacy and risk of alcohol recidivism
| Scoring system | Method | Risk factors measured |
| PACT (1989) | 8-item exam; Rated on 5-point scale; Final independent score given to rater's overall impression of candidates' acceptability of a transplant | Knowledge and receptiveness to education; Compliance with medical treatment; Drug and alcohol use; Healthy lifestyle habits and sustainable practices; Risk for psychopathology; Psychopathology, stable personality factors; Family/support system stability |
| MAPS (1990) | 12-item exam; Items vary from yes/no questions and scaled items; Final score assesses risk of alcohol relapse | Acceptance of alcoholism; Prognostic indices; Social stability |
| PLS (1991) | 7-item exam; 3-point scale; Final score examines psychological vulnerability | Past psychiatric history; Quality of family/social support; Prior coping history; Coping with disease/treatment, ability to anticipate problems; Quality of affect; Mental status |
| TERS (1993) | 10-item exam; 3-point scale; Final score indicates functioning level | Prior psychiatric history; Substance abuse; Compliance; Health behaviors; Quality of social support; Prior coping history |
| HRAR (1993) | 3-item exam; Each item stratified into 3 groups of varying severity; Single score given based on risk of alcoholism | Duration of heavy drinking in years; Number of drinks per day; Number of prior alcoholism inpatient hospitalizations |
| SIPAT (2012) | 18-item exam; 4 psychosocial themes evaluated; Varying number of questions for each theme ranging from 3-5 questions; Final score determines risk of candidates for transplantation | Patient's readiness level and illness management; Social support system level of readiness; Psychological stability and psychopathology; Lifestyle and effect of substance use |
| ARRA (2013) | 9-item exam; Final score determines placement into 1 of 4 groups (ARRA I-IV) based on rates of post LT alcohol use | Presence of hepatocellular carcinoma; Tobacco, alcohol dependent; Motivation for alcohol treatment, stress management skills; Rehabilitation, social support status, nonmedical behaviors, amount of alcohol in social activities |
| HPSS (2017) | 11-item exam; 3-point scale; post-hoc analysis of patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis vs alcoholic cirrhosis with > 6 months of abstinence; Final score shows risk of alcohol relapse after transplant | Self-admission to hospital; drinks/day prior to period of abstinence; Insight to diagnosis; Marital status; Abstinence before transplant; Psychiatric comorbidity; History of other substance use; History of failed rehabilitation attempt; Family history of alcoholism; Employment status prior to hospitalization; Alcohol-related legal history |
| SALT (2018) | Machine learning technique through the multi-center, ACCELERATE-AH cohort; Outcome of interest was sustained alcohol use post LT | Drinks per day at initial hospitalization; Multiple prior rehabilitation attempts; Prior alcohol-related legal issues; Prior illicit substance abuse |
| HALT (2020) | Retrospective review obtained of liver transplant patients; Final score predicts risk of alcohol relapse after transplant | Age at liver transplant; Non-alcohol related criminal history; Pre-transplant abstinence period; Drinks per day |
- Citation: Jung J, Hasjim BJ, Chen A, Hussain F, Rohan V, Ladner DP, Cheung A. Early liver transplant for alcohol-associated liver disease: Current state and future directions. World J Transplant 2025; 15(4): 104589
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v15/i4/104589.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.104589