BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Transplant. Dec 18, 2025; 15(4): 104589
Published online Dec 18, 2025. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.104589
Table 2 Studies to date examining early-liver transplantation for alcohol-associated hepatitis
Ref.
Location
Study format
Early LT candidacy criteria
n
Primary outcome
Survival rate
Relapse rate
Im et al, 2016[61]United StatesRetrospectiveMathurin et al[28] criteria (see Table 3). Inclusion of patients with recent infection and gastrointestinal bleeding186-month patient survival or early LT6 months patient: 89% (early LT) vs 11% (no LT at 6 months, matched controls; P < 0.001)Any alcohol relapse: 25% among early LT group
Lee et al, 2017[32]United States RetrospectiveMathurin et al[28] criteria (see Table 3). Inclusion of patients with previous diagnosed but adequately managed mental health disorder. Inclusion of patients with recent infection and gastrointestinal bleeding433-year patient survival and alcohol relapse6 months patient: 100% (early LT) vs 88.5% (standard LT; P = 0.27). No significant difference in patient survival (P = 0.922) between early- and standard LT over 3 yearsAny alcohol relapse: 23.5% (early LT) vs 29.2% (standard LT; P > 0.99). Alcohol relapse with harmful patterns: 23.5% (early LT) vs 11.5% (standard LT; P = 0.42)
Weeks et al, 2018[33]United StatesRetrospectiveMathurin et al[28] criteria (see Table 3). Inclusion of patients with previous diagnosed but adequately managed mental health disorder. Inclusion of patients with recent infection and gastrointestinal bleeding801-year patient and graft survival. 1-year alcohol relapse rate1 year patient: 97% (early LT) vs 100% (standard LT; P = 1.00). 1 year graft: 93% (early LT) vs 89% (standard LT; P = 0.70). No significant difference in patient (P = 0.60) and graft (P = 0.80) survival rate between early- and standard LT over 5 yearsAny alcohol relapse: 28% (early LT) vs 24% (standard LT; P = 0.80). Alcohol relapse with harmful patterns: 17% (early LT) vs 12% (standard LT; P = 0.50)
Lee et al, 2018[29]United StatesRetrospectiveMathurin et al[28] criteria (see Table 3). The ACCELERATE-AH multi-center trial1471- and 3-year patient survival after early LT. Any alcohol use after early LT1 year patient: 94% (95%CI: 89%-97%); 3 years patient: 84% (95%CI: 75%-90%)Any alcohol relapse: 25% (95%CI: 18%-34%) at 1-year and 34% (95%CI: 25%-44%) at 3-years post-early LT
Herrick-Reynolds et al, 2021[31]United StatesRetrospectiveNIAA criteria (see Table 1)1633-year patient, allograft, relapse-free, hazardous relapse-free survival1 year patient: 94.1% (early LT) vs 95.9% (standard LT; P = 0.60). 3 years patient: 83.0% (early LT) vs 78.6% (standard LT; P = 0.60). 1 year allograft: 92.7% (early LT) vs 90.5% (standard LT; P = 0.42). 3 years allograft: 81.7% (early LT) vs 74.7% (standard LT; P = 0.42)Early LT no association with relapse (HR = 0.77, 95%CI: 0.42-1.42, P = 0.41. adjusted HR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.46-1.63, P = 0.66). Early LT no association with hazardous relapse (HR = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.36-1.51, P = 0.41. Adjusted HR = 0.88. 95%CI: 0.42-1.86. P = 0.74). Younger age (21-30 years) associated with relapse (HR = 5.60, 95%CI: 1.32-23.68, P = 0.02) and hazardous relapse (HR = 6.92, 95%CI: 1.53-31.32, P = 0.01)
Germani et al, 2022[62]ItalyRetrospectiveMathurin et al[28] criteria (see Table 3). Inclusion of patients with previous diagnosed but adequately managed mental health disorder. Inclusion of patients with recent infection and gastrointestinal bleeding933-year patient survival rate6-, 12-, 24, 36-month patient survival in early LT patients (100% across all points) significantly higher than patients that are non-responders to medical therapy and denied LT (41%, 41%, 38% and 35% respectively; log-rank P < 0.001). 6-, 12-, 24, 36-month patient survival in early LT patients (100% across all points) significantly higher than patients who are responders to medical therapy (77%, 67%, 65% and 55% respectively; log-rank P = 0.008)Any alcohol relapse: 12% among early LT group
Carrique et al, 2021[30]CanadaRetrospectiveNIAA criteria (see Table 1). Inclusion of patients with decompensated ALD without SAH. Includes "intensive relapse prevention therapy" in early LT patients1552-year patient survival30 days patient: 95.5% (early LT; 95%CI: 83.0%-98.8%) vs 97.3% (standard LT; 95%CI: 91.7%-99.1%). 6 months patient: 88.6% (early LT; 95%CI: 74.8%-95.1%) vs 96.3% (standard LT; 95%CI: 90.4%-98.6%). 1 year patient: 88.6% (early LT; 95%CI: 74.8-95.1%) vs 96.3% (standard LT; 95%CI: 90.4%-98.6%). 2 years patient: 88.6% (early LT; 95%CI: 74.8%-95.1%) vs 94.1% (standard LT; 95%CI: 87.3%-97.3%)6.8% of early LT patients vs 16% of standard LT patients returned to alcohol use after transplant (P = 0.21)
Louvet et al, 2022[35]France-BelgiumProspectiveMathurin et al[28] criteria (see Table 3). Additional scoring criteria by study team (≥ 220 points = early LT)161Non-inferiority of the 2-year rate of alcohol relapse in the early LT group vs standard LT group.24 months patient: 89.7% (early LT) vs 88.2% (standard LT; HR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.33-2.26). 24 months patient: 70.6% (early LT) vs 28.3% (non-eligible for early LT; HR = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.16-0.47)24 months: 34% (early LT) vs 25% (standard LT; Absolute difference = 9.1%, 95%CI: -∞ to 21.1, P = 0.45); non-inferiority of early LT for alcohol relapse not proven
Musto et al, 2024[60]United StatesRetrospectiveNIAA criteria (see Table 1)33410-year patient adjusted survival in early LT, standard LT and non-ALD diagnoses10 years patient: early LT (referent) vs standard LT (adjusted HR = 1.31, 95%CI: 0.79-2.17; P = 0.30)10 years: Early LT (referent) vs standard LT (adjusted HR = 1.47, 95%CI: 0.88-2.45, P = 0.14)
10 years patient: Early LT (referent) vs non-ALD (adjust HR = 1.68, 95%CI: 0.79-2.78, P = 0.04)


Write to the Help Desk