©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Transplant. Dec 18, 2025; 15(4): 104349
Published online Dec 18, 2025. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.104349
Published online Dec 18, 2025. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.104349
Table 3 Overview of different cell-free DNA biomarkers
| Biomarker | Characteristics and clinical utility |
| Total (plasma/serum cfDNA) | Donor plus recipient-derived cfDNA |
| Reflects total cell damage, not limited to the allograft[21] | |
| Possible release of recipient-derived cfDNA by recipient’s immunological effector cells activated during rejection[22] | |
| Donor-derived plasma/serum cfDNA | Directly interrogates graft integrity[23] |
| Increased in cases of graft damage[24] | |
| Urinary cfDNA | Tr-DNA |
| Molecules crossing the kidney barrier and appearing in urine as a soluble fraction[25] | |
| Reflects increased burden of tissue injury and apoptosis[24] | |
| Donor-derived or recipient derived |
- Citation: Salvadori M, Rosso G. Utility and limitations of the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA in kidney transplantation. World J Transplant 2025; 15(4): 104349
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v15/i4/104349.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.104349