©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Transplant. Dec 18, 2025; 15(4): 104349
Published online Dec 18, 2025. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.104349
Published online Dec 18, 2025. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.104349
Table 10 Interpretation of donor-derived cell-free DNA results according to the clinical context
| Clinical context | dd-cfDNA result | Interpretation | Management |
| Acute graft dysfunction | High | Rejection likely | Biopsy to confirm |
| Low | Rejection unlikely | Biopsy to exclude TCMR and other pathologies | |
| Stable graft function | High | Rejection likely | Proceed with protocol biopsy |
| Low | Rejection unlikely | Avoid protocol biopsy | |
| Chronic graft dysfunction | High | Chronic AMR likely | Consider biopsy to guide treatment |
| Low | Chronic AMR unlikely | Consider biopsy to detect other pathologies | |
| Rejection undergoing treatment | High | Ongoing rejection | Continued treatment of rejection |
| Low | Resolution of rejection | Clinical monitoring |
- Citation: Salvadori M, Rosso G. Utility and limitations of the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA in kidney transplantation. World J Transplant 2025; 15(4): 104349
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v15/i4/104349.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.104349