©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Transplant. Dec 18, 2025; 15(4): 104349
Published online Dec 18, 2025. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.104349
Published online Dec 18, 2025. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.104349
Table 1 Comparison of advantages and disadvantages between absolute and fractional values
| Metric | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Absolute value | Not influenced by fluctuations in WBC - derived cfDNA levels | Poor comparability between different experimental platforms |
| Not affected by variations in the extent of inflammation in different pathological conditions | Long-term storage of plasma/urine samples, even within the same experimental platform, can also impact results | |
| Not influenced by recipient cell lysis during blood drawn | ||
| Fractional value | Not influenced by total cfDNA degradation and extraction reagents | Prone to fluctuations in WBC levels, such as during rejection detection in infection states |
| Strong compatibility between different experimental platforms |
- Citation: Salvadori M, Rosso G. Utility and limitations of the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA in kidney transplantation. World J Transplant 2025; 15(4): 104349
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v15/i4/104349.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.104349