Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Psychiatry. Mar 19, 2024; 14(3): 370-379
Published online Mar 19, 2024. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i3.370
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of non-brain injured patients, n (%)

Dexmedetomidine (n = 52)
Propofol (n = 63)
P value
Age (yr), median (IQR)61.0 (55.0-64.0)61.0 (53.0-66.0)0.663
Male30 (57.7)39 (61.9)0.646
BMI (kg/m2), median (IQR)21.8 (19.6-24.3)21.1 (19.0-22.3)0.191
SAPS II, median (IQR)46.0 (38.0-54.0)46.0 (36.0-53.0)0.675
Main reason for ICU
Medical37 (71.2)44 (69.9)0.983
Surgical10 (19.2)13 (20.6)
Trauma5 (9.6)6 (9.5)
Infection at ICU admission 24 (46.2)30 (47.6)0.875
SOFA score of organ > 2
Respiratory30 (57.7)35 (55.6)0.818
Cardiovascular26 (50.0)27 (42.9)0.444
Renal8 (15.4)10 (15.9)0.943
Coagulation4 (7.7)6 (9.5)0.729
Liver1 (1.9)1 (1.6)0.891
Total SOFA score, median (IQR)7.0 (4.0-9.0)6.0 (3.0-9.0)0.954
RASS score at enrollment, median (IQR)-2 (-3 to -1)-3 (-3 to -1)0.247
Time from ICU admission to drug initiation (h), median (IQR)32.0 (20.0-35.0)31.0 (20.0-42.0)0.798
Table 2 Dosage of study drugs during mechanical ventilation

Dexmedetomidine (n = 52)
Propofol (n = 63)
P value
Duration of study drug infusion (h), median (IQR)52.0 (36.0-73.5)53.0 (37.0-72.0)0.958
Dose of study drug (μg or mg/kg/h), median (IQR)0.58 (0.34-0.79)0.82 (0.65-1.32)-
Dose of remifentanil (μg/kg/h), median (IQR)4.5 (4.0-5.0)4.6 (4.0-5.0)0.395
Receiving rescue sedation, n (%)36.0 (69.2)32.0 (50.8)0.045
Table 3 Comparison of sedative effect between the two groups

Dexmedetomidine (n = 52)
Propofol (n = 63)
P value
Percentage of time within the target RASS (%), median (IQR)85.6 (65.8-96.6)86.7 (72.3-95.3)0.592
Percentage of target RASS score (%), median (IQR)72.2 (60.8-91.7)73.3 (60.0-100.0)0.880
Table 4 Comparison of S100-β serum levels between the two groups
TimeDexmedetomidine
Propofol
P value
nS100-βnS100-β
Day 0520.12 (0.06-0.18)630.14 (0.08-0.23)0.4080
Day 1522.12 (2.03-2.22)633.02 (2.92-3.18)< 0.001
Day 2522.30 (2.18-2.48)633.53 (3.32-3.85)< 0.001
Day 3522.88 (2.67-3.05)633.62 (3.39-4.06)< 0.001
Day 4353.58 (3.36-3.85)404.70 (4.35-4.97)< 0.001
Day 5224.46 (4.34-4.58)284.98 (4.86-5.44)< 0.001
Day 6154.83 (4.68-5.03)195.33 (4.98-5.65)0.0026
Day 7105.06 (4.81-5.32)145.38 (5.19-5.67)0.0562
Table 5 Comparison of neuron-specific enolase serum levels between the two groups
TimeDexmedetomidine
Propofol
P value
n
NSE
n
NSE
Day 0529.95 (9.08-10.65)639.86 (9.35-10.56)0.9570
Day 15220.09 (17.63-21.43)6321.42 (20.71-23.08)< 0.001
Day 25220.35 (17.96-21.50)6322.35 (21.38-23.92)< 0.001
Day 35224.89 (21.87-26.85)6326.25 (25.15-27.35)< 0.001
Day 43526.62 (23.43-29.35)4029.17 (26.61-31.14)0.0082
Day 52226.75 (24.93-29.37)2829.66 (27.72-31.14)0.0047
Day 61528.93 (26.35-30.52)1930.72 (28.65-31.98)0.0774
Day 71028.34 (26.95-31.23)1430.54 (28.90-32.46)0.2060