Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Psychiatry. Aug 19, 2022; 12(8): 1076-1087
Published online Aug 19, 2022. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i8.1076
Table 1 The demographic data and scale score comparison between medical staff (n = 406) and community residents (n = 226) on baseline
Variable
Medical staff (n = 406)
Community residents (n = 226)
t/χ²/Z
P value
Age (yr), mean ± SD36.18 ± 8.8341.54 ± 11.841.460.145
Gender, n (%)
Male70 (17.24)80 (35.40)
Female336 (82.76)146 (64.60)6320.000
Scale scores, median (range)
HADS 11 (4-35)12 (4-32)-1.5170.129
HADS-A 6 (2-18)7 (2-17)-0.8890.374
HADS-D 5 (1-20)5 (1-18)-1.9840.047
ASDS 28 (19-89)27 (19-76)-0.4390.66
ISI4 (0-28)5 (0-28)-2.050.040
Table 2 Comparison of the scores in each insomnia severity index items in different quarantine locations in doctors and nurses’ group on baseline (n = 252)
VariableGroups based on quarantine site’s
χ²P value
Hospital (n = 70)
Hotel (n = 134)
Home (n = 48)
ISI items
Severity (1 + 2 + 3)1 (0, 9)2 (0, 12)1 (0, 9)7.6540.022
1 Falling asleep0 (0, 3)0 (0, 4)0 (0, 4)6.7930.033
2 Staying asleep0 (0, 3)0 (0, 4)0 (0, 3)9.290.010
3 Early awakening0 (0, 3)1 (0, 4)0 (0, 3)3.8410.147
4 Satisfaction1 (0, 4)1 (0, 4)1 (0, 4)1.1640.559
5 Interfere1 (0, 4)1 (0, 4)0.5 (0, 4)3.1430.208
6 Noticeable1 (0, 4)1 (0, 4)0 (0, 3)4.2930.117
7 Worried0 (0, 3)1 (0, 4)0 (0, 3)3.7690.152
Table 3 Demographic and scales of the participants at baseline (n = 360) and at the end of follow-up (n = 199) in doctors and nurses’ group
Variable
Baseline (n = 360)
Follow-up (n = 199)
t/χ²/Z
P value
Age (yr), mean ± SD35.79 ± 8.5334.71 ± 7.801.460.145
D&N group, n (%)360 (100)199 (100)
Gender, n (%)
Male53 (14.72)22 (11.06)
Female307 (85.28)177 (88.94)1.4830.223
Scale scores, median (range)
HADS 11 (4-35)10 (0-33)-3.9230.000
HADS-A 6 (2-18)6 (0-19)-4.4690.000
HADS-D 4 (1-20)4 (0-16)-3.2860.001
ASDS 27.5 (19-89)26 (19-66)-2.4680.014
ISI4 (0-28)5 (0-25)-0.9280.353